Is Wikipedia reliable?

From Wikitruth

Jump to: navigation, search
There are now enough serious incidents of false and defamatory information in Wikipedia biographies to warrant prohibiting this as a reference source in universities and university-level professional schools. ... This is made worse by the fact that Wikipedia is an automatic flow-through resource for other on-line sources.
— Ken Friedman, Norwegian School of Management [1]

Contents

[edit] Notable Wikipedia hoaxes

Utterly false, fabricated entries in Wikipedia, some of real people and some not at all, that persisted for weeks or months before being removed or fixed.
I do not consider [Wikipedia] to be an appropriate source for use in academic work.
— Robert Rubin, Wright State University [2]
Relying on the Wikipedia for academic research seems a sloppy and negligent way to work.
— Wayne Bivens-Tatum, Princeton University [3]
I would advise teachers not to accept any student essays that use Wikipedia as a source.
— Paul Axelrod, Dean of York University [4]
Wikipedia is not getting better. It is getting worse. ... Wikipedia is unacceptable as a research tool.
— Ken Friedman, Norwegian School of Management [5]
The important point that we wish to communicate to all students taking courses and submitting work in our department in the future is that they cite Wikipedia at their peril.
— Don Wyatt, History Chair, Middlebury[6]

[edit] Educational institutions that have prohibited Wikipedia for research

Colleges, universities, and schools where professors/teachers have prohibited use of Wikipedia for academic research or as a source of reference.

[edit] Jimbo weighs in

He knows, even if you don't.
No, I don't think people should cite it.
Jimbo Wales [7]

[edit] "Wikipedia articles can't be used as sources" by other articles

Apparently, the "sum of all human knowledge" doesn't consider itself to be a reliable source.

[edit] See also

Is your school, hoax, or school-hoax missing from this page? Please contact us and let us know!
Personal tools